home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT1412>
- <title>
- Oct. 17, 1994: Controversy:D.A.R.E. Bedeviled
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- Oct. 17, 1994 Sex in America
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- CONTROVERSY, Page 49
- D.A.R.E. Bedeviled
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> A new study questions the effectiveness of the country's most
- popular drug-prevention program
- </p>
- <p>By Sylvester Monroe/Atlanta--With reporting by Lisa H. Towle/Durham
- </p>
- <p> The initials are plastered on bumper stickers and school bulletin
- boards from California to the Carolinas: DARE. The acronym stands
- for Drug Abuse Resistance Education, a $750 million-a-year drug-prevention
- program that is the most popular in the nation. But is it the
- most successful?
- </p>
- <p> In the past three years, a number of parents' groups have organized
- against the program, protesting what they call the pseudo psychology
- at its core. Says Gary Peterson of Colorado, the founder of
- the fledgling national group Parents Against DARE: "Our schools
- are giving away more and more time to social-engineering programs
- that have not been sufficiently researched." Says Richard Evans
- of Northampton, Massachusetts: "DARE is awash in the touchy-feely
- stuff of the '70s. It's tricky and the kind of thing parents
- need to take a closer look at." Last week the critics of DARE
- received new ammunition by way of the biggest backer of DARE--the Department of Justice.
- </p>
- <p> A three-year, $300,000 study has concluded that the effect of
- DARE's core curriculum--conducted by specially trained local
- police officers in 17 weekly, 45-to-60-min. sessions for fifth-
- and sixth-grade students--is statistically insignificant in
- preventing drug use among that group. Resources might be better
- spent on longer-term, more interactive programs. The study was
- conducted by the Research Triangle Institute in Durham, North
- Carolina, and commissioned by the National Institute of Justice,
- the research arm of the Department of Justice.
- </p>
- <p> The Justice Department has refused to accept the report's key
- findings. Defenders of DARE question R.T.I.'s analysis of data,
- saying fifth- and sixth-graders rarely use drugs and were therefore
- the wrong sample to study. "It was too strong a statement,"
- says William DeJong, a lecturer at the Harvard School of Public
- Health, who evaluated DARE in 1985. "It was a provocative conclusion
- not warranted by the study." R.T.I., however, stands by its
- conclusions, adding that it looked at fifth- and sixth-graders
- exactly because that has been DARE's target group. Said R.T.I.
- researcher Susan Ennett: "Unless there's some sort of booster
- session that reinforces the original curriculum, the effects
- of most drug-use-prevention programs decay rather than increase
- with time." Ray, 18, who came through the DARE program in Los
- Angeles, is a good case in point. He smokes pot. "Mostly everyone
- I know who was in DARE back with me are doing the same thing
- I'm doing and more," he says. "Everybody I know gets high. I
- don't think it worked. Not for me."
- </p>
- <p> But if not DARE, what? Before DARE, says David Seibles, a 10-year
- veteran with the Gwinnett County police department in Georgia,
- "it used to be that you'd come in once a year and say, `Don't
- do drugs,' and by the time you'd get to the front door, the
- kids had forgotten everything you said." Says Debbie Allred,
- principal of Cedar Hill Elementary School in Gwinnett County:
- "If we didn't have DARE, we'd miss it tremendously. It would
- be a great loss."
- </p>
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-